Spór z organami podatkowymi?
Precedensowy wyrok NSA - wygrana Praktyki Podatkowej
The judgment was delivered in the case of a client in the industrial packaging sector in a dispute with the tax administration authorities over taxation of intra-Community supplies of goods at the 0% VAT rate. The SAC judgment may be significant for taxpayers conducting disputes centred on good faith and due care.
Experts from the Tax Practice have successfully represented a client in the industrial packaging sector in a dispute over the taxation of intra-Community supplies of goods at the 0% VAT rate. The authorities questioned the taxpayer’s right to apply this rate due to alleged lack of good faith and due care in the disputed transactions.
In three judgments, the Supreme Administrative Court overturned the decisions of the first instance court and the second instance authority, sharing the client's view that the tax authorities had not properly analysed the evidence. First of all, the SAC pointed out that the taxpayer's good faith and due care should be viewed taking into account that the transaction model challenged by the authorities had previously been verified in tax audits and that the tax audit reports had confirmed that the company's tax settlements were correct. The SAC indicated that, in this situation, unless significant changes had been made to the transaction model, the taxpayer could act on the basis of trust in the assessment made by the tax authorities in the audit reports.
The judgment shows that the tax authorities must take responsibility for their previous actions, i.e. tax audits and their findings. The fact that audit reports do not have the weight of res judicata does not mean that they can be disregarded when assessing the good faith and due care of the taxpayer. The SAC judgment appears to be of a precedential nature, as earlier the courts (and in this case the court of first instance) had not attached any importance to the verification of the transaction made by the tax authorities for taxpayers prior to the proceedings involving the dispute.
The SAC judgment may be crucial for taxpayers in disputes with the tax authorities which are based on good faith and due care, where, before certain transactions were challenged, they had been verified by the tax authorities in other procedures, particularly during tax audits.
The landmark SAC judgment has also been commented on in today's press: Dziennik Gazeta Prawna and Rzeczpospolita
From 25 May 2018 the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies in Poland and other European Union countries. We would therefore like to give you several details on the subject of how DZP processes personal data.
The administrator of the personal data is Domański Zakrzewski Palinka Sp.k. (“DZP”; address: Rondo ONZ 1, 00-124 Warszawa). Data are processed for contact purposes and to impart information on changes to provisions and authority practices and on other issues, including events concerning day-to-day legal, economic and cultural issues, inter alia, by sending DZP newsletters. The above is carried out on the basis of legitimate interests, i.e. in accordance with art. 6(1)(f) of the GDPR. Data can also be processed where necessary for the conclusion or performance of a contract and for compliance with a legal obligation to which DZP is subject, i.e. pursuant to art. 6(1)(b) and (c) of the GDPR. Data can be transferred to entities with whose help DZP achieves the indicated aims, including entities maintaining IT infrastructure. Giving data is voluntary and in contractual relations is a requirement for concluding and performing a contract. It is possible to object to data processing, request access to, rectification and erasure of personal data or restriction of processing and data portability. Data are kept until an objection is made, and in contractual relations – throughout the term of the contract and thereafter for a period specified in provisions on archiving and limitations period for claims. Anyone has the right to file a complaint with the President of the Personal Data Protection Office. Questions concerning privacy at DZP can be sent to DZP’s Data Protection Inspector, Macieja Maciejewskiego, at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
New rules on cookies: Domański Zakrzewski Palinka sp.k., as the service provider of the www.dzp.pl website, stores and accesses cookies, i.e. small text information fles sent by a web server and stored on your hard drive, or other data storage medium of a user, for the purposes of: proper functioning of the www.dzp.pl website, confguring the www.dzp.pl website, security and reliability of the www.dzp.pl website, session monitoring, providing advertisements, personalization of the displayed information to the user, or analysis, statistics, research and website trafc auditing.