What's new at DZP?
Experts from the Tax Practice have successfully represented an FMCG sector client in a dispute over costs incurred in acquiring shares in a related company, which were subsequently sold at a price lower than the acquisition price, thereby generating a tax loss, being treated as tax costs. The tax authorities claimed that the acquisition of the shares was aimed solely at gaining a tax benefit and that it did not meet any of the criteria for the costs being included in tax costs, i.e. earning income or preserving or securing a source of income.
In a judgment of 6 December 2019, case no. II FSK 2078/19, the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) dismissed the authority's last resort appeal against a judgment of the Voivodship Administrative Court in Gliwice, which was favourable to the taxpayer.
Administrative courts at both instances confirmed that, during the period covered by the proceedings (i.e. in 2010), the tax authorities had no grounds to question the entity’s tax settlements, even assuming that the legal transactions were carried out in order to gain a tax benefit. The SAC indicated that, in the legal regime at that time, there was no tax law circumvention clause and that neither Article 199a of the Tax Code nor Article 15(1) of the CIT Act fulfilled this function. Consequently, these regulations do not give grounds for refusing to recognise the expenditure as a tax cost due to the authorities' desire to prevent the taxpayer from gaining a tax benefit.
At the same time, the SAC agreed with the conclusion reached by the Voivodship Administrative Court in Gliwice that, in the event of the shares being sold and income being earned in this respect, the costs of acquiring the shares were tax deductible because the aim of incurring expenditure in order to earn income is met and the link between the expenditure and the income is clear and obvious. In the circumstances, it is not necessary to analyse the existence of a link between incurring expenditure to acquire shares and obtaining income from their sale (the expenditure determines the realisation of revenue).
The SAC judgment is of a precedential nature, as the SAC explicitly confirmed that, in the legal regime prior to the introduction of the general tax evasion clause, Article 15 of the CIT Act could not function as an anti-avoidance clause.
The SAC judgment is also of key importance for taxpayers in dispute with the tax authorities, particularly as regards the tax consequences of a restructuring carried out before the introduction of the GAAR clause (before July 2016). It should cool down the efforts of the revenue administration authorities, which are trying at all costs to challenge the tax settlements of taxpayers concerning periods when the tax law circumvention clause was not in force, regardless of the lack of legal grounds for this course of action.
From 25 May 2018 the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies in Poland and other European Union countries. We would therefore like to give you several details on the subject of how DZP processes personal data.
The administrator of the personal data is Domański Zakrzewski Palinka Sp.k. (“DZP”; address: Rondo ONZ 1, 00-124 Warszawa). Data are processed for contact purposes and to impart information on changes to provisions and authority practices and on other issues, including events concerning day-to-day legal, economic and cultural issues, inter alia, by sending DZP newsletters. The above is carried out on the basis of legitimate interests, i.e. in accordance with art. 6(1)(f) of the GDPR. Data can also be processed where necessary for the conclusion or performance of a contract and for compliance with a legal obligation to which DZP is subject, i.e. pursuant to art. 6(1)(b) and (c) of the GDPR. Data can be transferred to entities with whose help DZP achieves the indicated aims, including entities maintaining IT infrastructure. Giving data is voluntary and in contractual relations is a requirement for concluding and performing a contract. It is possible to object to data processing, request access to, rectification and erasure of personal data or restriction of processing and data portability. Data are kept until an objection is made, and in contractual relations – throughout the term of the contract and thereafter for a period specified in provisions on archiving and limitations period for claims. Anyone has the right to file a complaint with the President of the Personal Data Protection Office. Questions concerning privacy at DZP can be sent to DZP’s Data Protection Inspector, Macieja Maciejewskiego, at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
New rules on cookies: Domański Zakrzewski Palinka sp.k., as the service provider of the www.dzp.pl website, stores and accesses cookies, i.e. small text information fles sent by a web server and stored on your hard drive, or other data storage medium of a user, for the purposes of: proper functioning of the www.dzp.pl website, confguring the www.dzp.pl website, security and reliability of the www.dzp.pl website, session monitoring, providing advertisements, personalization of the displayed information to the user, or analysis, statistics, research and website trafc auditing.